![]() I test with pandoc's strict markdown output and make sure the resulting markdown is readable: If you want to go the extra mile and ensure that your website works with the most basic HTML parsers, try sending it through an HTML-to-Markdown converter that doesn't include inline html in the Markdown output. Originally written for blind users, it's great for sighted users as well. With the exception of a few whitespace characters, their output of both seems to be identical.Įdbrowse is a line-mode browser that supports JavaScript via Duktape. Mozilla's Readability is written in JS these tools are written in C and Go, respectively. ![]() I also like to diff my website's HTML against the HTML output of these tools, just to see how much extraneous HTML I have. Testing in these ensures that your website will work in Firefox's Reader Mode. Pipe that into w3m/lynx/links to read articles in the terminal. Rdrview, go-readability: these are CLI utilities that use Mozilla's Readability algorithm to send HTML of just the article to stdout. Oh, hello there again! It's always good to see people testing their site on non-mainstream user-agents. That is how I think of users who use the popular graphical browsers, waiting arbitray amounts of time on every website for pages to "load", making dozens of unnecessary connections to third party servers. Funny how he calls anyone who would use a text-only browser exclusively a "masochist". Of course, this is not a topic anyone really cares about. I would love to do a side-by-side comparison of text-only browsers. (this is what initially hoookd me on links) and 2. To answer your question, the two biggest reasons I would always choose links over lynx is 1. It makes me think they do not actually use a text-only browser much (e.g., once in a while), and that they have not tried them all. It baffles me when people recommend lynx today. I used lynx through a public access UNIX system for some years. As an internet user beginning the late 80's, I always tried every linemode or text-only browser I heard about. It is my primary browser for recreational web use. Bias disclosure: I have been a links user for over 20 years.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |